Chrome is one of the first things I disable on my Android devices, and I hate the idea of signing up for any accounts just to access local files.

But Canon welcomed me with a big surprise, and a fuck you, too!

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      The problem is, you don’t always know they will do this until after you pay your money for them.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Of course, it always is.

          But a lot of this type of enshittification can be difficult to learn about without getting your hands on thw product first. Especially if it’s a new model.

  • KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    bye bye Canon. You were once the light of my photographic life - now you’re dead to me for pulling this bullshit.

  • krf@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Firefox doesn’t support WebUSB, Web Bluetooth and several other integrations, so applications that need to connect to other devices need some kind of Chrome application. Massive dick move by forcing account creation tho.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Firefox doesn’t support WebUSB, Web Bluetooth and several other integrations, so applications that need to connect to other devices need some kind of Chrome application.

      If those features in the browser were needed, I could be a little less infuriated (they didn’t have to break previously working features, though).

      However, Chrome was needed only to sign up and log in. Once that was done, I was able to disable chrome, and the app continued to work after restarting it.

      Why they couldn’t implement a log in directly in the app, or use the device webview api, is beyond me.

    • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m just waiting for that WebAntivirus support to land in chrome, for all those websites that tell you to install an antivirus.

  • Flickerby@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is there something about Chrome specifically that’s no bueno nowadays? I haven’t heard anything but to be fair I don’t really keep myself in that loop too much now

    • CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s a general negative attitude towards chromium browsers due to some anticompetitive practices pulled by Google in addition to privacy concerns and probably some more issues I’m not aware of. So that includes chrome, but also edge and most other chromium based browsers.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t want any of my business being shared with Google, including the fact that I use Canon products. It’s just yet another data point for them to weaponize via targeted ads and data brokering.

      And simply opening Chrome means that a data siphon to Google was just opened, so telemetry data would have been collected immediately.

  • Soapbox1858@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dude. I needed to use this app the other day for the remote shutter function, and I was somewhere with no signal and no internet. Only to discover that the app had updated and now required me to create an account to use it. I was pissed.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    3 days ago

    Canon is on my personal blacklist for decades. I bought a printer from them, not just a normal A4/legal, but a professional, wide one that uses rolls of paper, etc. I was unhappy with the state of the driver under Linux, so I called and asked for a programming documentation to write my own printer driver. Their opinion on Linux/open source was that “open source is theft of intellectual property”.

    • quack@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 days ago

      I wonder how many open source libraries their driver codebase relies on, it had best be zero with that attitude.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        They had no Linux driver back then at all, but there were some rudimentary from the community that printed Ok. They just did not support special printing modes, which i wanted to add.

    • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Their opinion is stupid, but I’m also not sure what you expected when you asked some random sales rep for deep technical info.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 days ago

        I contacted both technical support for commercial systems and later their booth on a big technical trade fair (CeBit Hannover), and got basically the same opinion both times. The first was definitely no “Sales Rep”, and the people at the booth were a manager and an engineer.

        But I agree, their opinion is stupid.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well, in a commercial space, at least if you’re big enough, asking sales reps for deep tech info is the norm. They are supposed to find an engineer and get them to answer.

        If you’re a big enough customer, you set the norms.

  • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t have much experience with cameras but isn’t it usually sd cards that you can pull out and transfer using a sd reader? Does the camera have internal storage that needs an account and app?

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      For data transfer only, yes, you can eject the SD card and copy your files.

      But the app is used for other features, too. So you’re inconvenienced no matter what feature you use.

      • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah I guessed that much but your original post was a bit confusing as it doesn’t mention the app. Hence the question.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Magic Lantern is awesome!

      Unfortunately, it’s for higher-end cameras, not my old point-and-shoot cameras. And it doesn’t magically give your device GPS for geotagging images :(

      The app was fine. The enshittification of the app is not.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yes, another user already confirmed that the old version still works. I’ve done the same with the old GoPro app.

          EDIT: but old versions have built-in planned obsolescence, because they won’t support newer devices (both cameras or smartphones) for very long. My Samsung 360 camera was rendered useless once they discontinued app support.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I have an old Gear VR and a Samsung S3. I don’t believe there is any way to use it today. It wants to connect to Facebook to log in, but their auth token has expired.

            • eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              You actually can still use it, there’s some folks on reddit trying their best to keep it going. App support is very poor though.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                My S3 is garbage. I only wanted to try and stream videos to it (without motion tracking) but even that seems too hard.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Jailbreaking locks you out of banking apps.

      Edit: jailbreaking your phone might lock you out of banking apps.

      Jailbreaking your camera does NOT.

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Don’t you gotta jailbreak your phone as well? Otherwise it will require the chrome browser

      • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Maybe on Apple (?), bur GrapheneOS supports my banking apps just fine. The only thing missing is Google Pay, which I don’t use anyways

        • krakenx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          How? Having an unlocked bootloader or root breaks Safety Net, which disables many apps. You need an unlocked bootloader to install custom ROMs.

          Magisck used to be a workaround, but Google has been sabotaging it at the OS and hardware layers, so it wasn’t working the last time I tried a few years ago.

      • lemsip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is a useless comment.

        Says the person who randomly brought up phones when the other person was talking about a camera jailbreak.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    237
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Forward it to Louis Rossman. He’ll make an entire video about it and add it to the wiki tracking these scummy companies.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree with pretty much all of that guy’s takes, but he REALLY sketches me out for some reason. I don’t know what it is.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I cannot stand him. I agree with the broad idea of his message, but Jesus he’s insufferable and constantly feels like he’s talking down to his audience

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        I agree with him on a lot of the tech stuff, but there’s some subtle hints of shit that I can’t consciously place that really bother me.

        I really started to notice it when he was looking for a new location - the way that he talked to and about some people and things in those videos bothered me. Likewise, the way he moved to a red state because it meant he could pay less in taxes and shit. There’s something more but I can’t put my finger on it.

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        He acts like a somethingawful/4chan veteran. Every now and then something along those lines slips out and rubs me the wrong way too.

        Like he’s often the good kind of libertarian, but occasionally also the bad kind.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Ahhh but I was a LUEser, a goon, then a heavy user of /b/ (until about 2009.) I don’t see myself in him at all hahaha

          • Noxy@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I used none of these sites and I’m telling you he seems like the type from the perspective of an outsider, and occasional victim/target of those kinds of sites :P

            • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m sorry for your experience D:

              I was a heavy user as a teen, and I definitely got into the stupid edgy humor but it was never directed at individuals for me. Then I grew up.

        • ProvableGecko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          He admitted he used to be openly right wing and he is still very pro-NATO. That’s Ok though, I still like his fuck cars videos.

          • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            Implying he isn’t right wing anymore, or just not openly?

            I agree with most of the stuff he says, he just doesn’t seem very nuanced and I find the angry tone slightly off-putting. I like NJB tho, probably because he’s just sarcastic at some points for effect.

      • malin@thelemmy.clubBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’d say the only thing ‘sketchy’ about Rossman is that he’s a normal human being.

        It’s rare to see someone independent in our homogenized society. It makes sense that someone like you would be afraid of them.

        • seralth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Naw dude is just inherently sketchy. His mannerisms and way of talking are two big ones.

          He’s the kinda guy that gives reason to the existence of the concept of a face guy. Rossman is not a face guy.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Nah it’s not that. And his “independent” takes are basically whatever is popular opinion on Lemmy (and formerly Reddit when I was on there.)

    • Siresly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I heard he was entertaining the thought of turning his role in Tropic Thunder into a full spinoff movie.

  • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    In order to access my tax and benefit accounts on the Government of Canada website I can only use Chrome … making sure to wipe all cookies, etc afterwards.

    I freaking hate shite like this.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Is that through the CRA website? I’ve been able to access it on Firefox (through Linux) without being hassled.

      But yeah, websites that force you to use Chrome would get on my nerves. I’d be sandboxing that entire browsing session, too. LOL

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        the CRA website? I’ve been able to access it on Firefox (through Linux) without being hassled.

        Same here.

        Maybe they’ve got some privacy plug-ins that are preventing the CRA website from functioning properly?

        In the past, I have had to add my bank and some government websites to my whitelist

      • xzot746@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I use FF on both Mac and PC for the CRA site. Can’t remember the last time I used a browser other than FF for anything.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ve had some sites simply not work right with Firefox, so I’ll use an alternative, usually just another flavour of Firefox, like Librewolf or Waterfox, and they tend to work just fine. It’s probably something to do with some of the locked down settings that I use on my primary browser, but it’s nothing compared to forced Google Chrome or gasp Internet Explorer. 😵

  • That Weird Vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    In terms of the chrome only thing, you can probably use a UA switcher on firefox and it will probs let you in. It’s probably just checking your user agent, nothing more.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      It actually wanted the chrome app to be enabled and only opens the chrome app for the sign up/log in process.

      So a user agent switch wouldn’t have helped in this case.

    • krf@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Firefox doesn’t support WebUSB and Web Bluetooth on any platform.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Yes indeed, I just wrote a rant about this in the Canon community on here.

    The two edges of this sword: All of the functionality worked in the previous edition of the app without the “mandatory” account. The upshot of this is, if you grab an APK of the previous (3.2.40.36) version of the app it still works just fine sans account, because the requirement is completely artificial and your camera’s hardware has not changed.

    That’s what I did for now, but given that I only ever used the damn thing as an overwrought remote shutter button when doing macrophotography (you’ll never guess the subject), I just bought $6 aftermarket remote release and moved on with life.

    For added fun and excitement, if you don’t have internet connectivity the app won’t work. So, like, if you’re out in the wilds on a hike with your camera. Nobody ever does that, right?

    All apps are crap. This one is extra crap, now. I’ve never used it for geotagging and certainly not for transferring images – not more than once, anyway, because on my phone it takes a solid 15 seconds per image. It would be faster for me to not only take the card out, but crack it open and inspect it with a tunneling electron microscope and type the ones and zeroes into a terminal by hand. I just put the damn card in a reader instead. Always have done.

    • LostXOR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      I was wondering what the OP was talking about since I use the app pretty frequently and haven’t had to make an account. Guess that clears it up; I won’t be updating it in the future.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      The two edges of this sword: All of the functionality worked in the previous edition of the app without the “mandatory” account. The upshot of this is, if you grab an APK of the previous (3.2.40.36) version of the app it still works just fine sans account, because the requirement is completely artificial and your camera’s hardware has not changed.

      Thank you for confirming! I do this with the GoPro Quik app, and I’d have no problem doing it here.

      I have a Sony compact camera with built-in GPS. The newer models require the app for live geotagging. These are the games I refuse to play.

    • Detun3d@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Thanks for the heads up. It’s version code 77 when downloading manually from Aurora Store in case anyone else is wondering. Please blacklist Canon Camera Connect after installing it to avoid further updates.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I use it to transfer images to my computer so I don’t have to pull out the sd card. But the tip with the apk is good, will do that too

  • Eddbopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well canon seems like a product to avoid. This person shouldn’t now know better for their future purchases l.

  • nickiam2@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    I rolled back the app to an older version before this was required and blocked it from network or updating. The only feature I use is the gps data over bluetooth and remote shutter. Canon can go F*** themselves with this nonsense