• thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I second you on the point about a “perfect partner”. However I still think a relationship can be “perfect”, because a relationship is much more than just the two people involved.

    As long as we accept that no realistic relationship is completely without conflict, I would say that a “perfect relationship” involves being able to work through the issues that inevitably show up. It’s something you build together, not something you just have.

    My impression is that the current “dating economy” breaks this perception a bit, to the point where a lot of people end up looking for the “perfect partner” that they automatically form the “perfect relationship” with, and aren’t willing to do much hard work to build that relationship. I don’t think that kind of “perfect relationship” (without any work) exists.

    • Libb@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      As long as we accept that no realistic relationship is completely without conflict, I would say that a “perfect relationship” involves being able to work through the issues that inevitably show up. It’s something you build together, not something you just have.

      Isn’t it what I just wrote? Real question (my English is lacking so…)

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I didn’t mean to come off as disagreeing with you, I think we generally agree. My point was that I think there can be such a thing as a “perfect relationship”, as long as we have a realistic idea of what that entails. I definitely agree that the idea of a “perfect relationship” that a lot of media tries to sell us is completely unrealistic though.

        Your english is great btw :)