• Bio bronk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yeah I just have ai build my uis and are slowly spinning up my own version of the web

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that’s not why we do it.

    — Richard P. Feynman

    I think the same is true for a lot of folks and self hosting. Sure, having data in our own hands is great, and yes avoiding vendor lock-in is nice. But at the end of the day, it’s nice to have computers seem “fun” again.

    At least, that’s my perspective.

      • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Recently getting back into Linux, it’s like choose your own adventure in computing. It’s been fun.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Self-housing, Linux, vim; hell, even gardening – they all fit this saying?axiom? pretty well.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Personally I don’t enjoy setting things up. I do enjoy not being tied down to evil corporations.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      99% of people want computers to serve them, not to be fun. My SO couldn’t care less how much fun I have setting up home assistant. They just want to turn on the lights.

      • EvilCartyen@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, yes, most people want computers to be unnoticable and boring. I agree, we need more boring tech that just does a job and doesn’t bother us. That said, plenty of people find self-hosting to be fun - your SO and mine excepted, of course.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          most people want computers to be unnoticable and boring. I agree, we need more boring tech

          professional UI designers don’t seem to agree. they always feel the urge to come up with the next worst design

          • aksdb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            For me it’s not even about better or worse, but about different. For them it’s a nice iteration after many years, but for be it is one of the dozens of apps I use irregularly that suddenly behaves and works different and forces me to relearn things I don’t have any gain from. Since each of the different apps get that treatment every once in a while, I end up having to adjust all the damn time for something else.

            I would really like we could go back to functional applications being sold as is without forced updates. I do not need constant changes all the time. WinAmp hasn’t changed in 20 years and still does exactly what it is supposed to. I could probably spin up an old MS Word 2000 and it would work just like it did 20 years ago.

            Many modern apps however change constantly. No wonder they all lean towards subscriptions if they “have to” work on it all the time. But I, as a user, don’t even want that. I want to buy the thing that does what it’s supposed to and then I want it to stay that way.

              • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 minutes ago

                I’ve set up my SO with adfree alternative clients for Youtube 3 times now, and she always defaults back to the adinfested youtube app - and she’s at least a competent user. i cannot wrap my head around it, but it’s her time and attention she’s wasting, not mine.

              • moomoomoo309@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                If they’re on android, try revanced. It’s a patched YouTube apk, so the interface is the same (unless you change stuff, like, for example, disabling shorts - but by default, it’s the same).

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Escaping vendor lock-in. It’s why people hate the cloud when it used to be the answer for everything. You make a good product that can only be used with your hardware/software, whatever, and people run from that shit because it’s abused more often than not.

    Apple is the biggest example of this. Synology is getting worse and worse. Plex not far behind either.

    • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I recently discovered that Plex no longer works over local network, if you lose internet service. A) you can’t login without internet access. B) even if you’re already logged in, apps do not find and recognize your local server without internet access. So, yeah, Plex is already there.

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I try to explain this to the plex cultists and they usually have one of two responses;

        1. “Why would I be without internet?”
        2. “How is that helpful?”

        Takes every ounce of willpower I have to not eye roll.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        A lot of people that run Plex have a Jellyfin container on standby, or they’ll use Plex for friends and family and use JF at home.

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          What is the point of Plex? I just went straight for Jellyfin and it does everything I need and then some. Is it just that people went with Plex initially and then stuck with it as it got enshittified?

          • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Plex has better security, federates and shares with other plex servers and generally is less hands-on for transcoding.

            But, I don’t use it. I like Jellyfin. It’s free and while it may lack a few features, it isn’t worse by any measure.

            • Laser@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Plex has better security, federates and shares with other plex servers and generally is less hands-on for transcoding.

              Regarding security, it’d be interesting to see how secure it actually is. Yeah, the individual endpoints might be protected better, but is Plex the company maybe a single point of failure?

      • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        even if you’re already logged in, apps do not find and recognize your local server without internet access.

        You set your server in those app’s settings to not use direct connect and thus they are being routed through Plex’s servers

        When you select your Plex libraries from the drop-down there are usually 2 options, one will be the local IP and say (direct), that’s always the best choice if you’re able

        I just turned off my Internet connection to my Chromecast and tested, no issues with accessing my media

        • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I’ll take another look, but I didn’t see any such setting when I was trying to diagnose. And I haven’t changed any Plex settings since the last time we had an internet outage and it worked properly, just a month or two ago.

          • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Chromecast w/ google TV, sorry, so like a fire stick but different branding. Once you’re signed into apps on it it’ll remember you cuz it’s a full android device

              • hangonasecond@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                I think they’re saying they’ve already signed into a Google account, downloaded play store apps, and set everything up. Afterwards, they have disconnected the Chromecast from the internet and successfully continued to access their self hosted content.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m down for paying for a piece of software. I bought a lifetime subscription back in the day I feel like until recently it served me pretty well. And to be fair they are caching the movie database, providing SSL keys, epg, low speed proxy through cgnat for people, there’s quite a bit too there cloud operations that they do deserve money for.

        What pisses me off is the mining of my watch habits, and the slow and enshitification of features.

        14 years of lifetime Plex pass for $75, they don’t really owe me anything, But I am moving on.

        I’m slowly digging my way out of sights with algorithms, clawing my way out of Google is particularly difficult. I’m considering spinning my own Alexa with whisper

      • shrugal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nothing wrong with having to pay for software if the prices are reasonable. It’s a product like any other, with real people working on it.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    People are looking to reclaim their agency and autonomy, we over relied on corpos and they used that as opportunity to price gouge us.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wanted to ask where the border of selfhosting is. Do I need to have the storage and computing at home?

    Is a cheap VPS on hetzner where I installed python, PieFed and it’s Postgres database but also nginx and letsencrpt manually by mydelf and pointed my domain to it, selfhosting?

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would say yes, it’s still self-hosting. It’s probably not “home labbing”, but it’s still you responsible for all the services you host yourself, it’s just the hardware which is managed by someone else.

      Also don’t let people discourage you from doing bare-metal.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Interesting distinction. I use a small managed vps, but didn’t consider that self-hosting, personally. I do aspire to switch to a homelab and figure out dynamic DNS and all that one day.

      • Stefen Auris@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s actually a good point, self hosting and home lab are similar things but don’t necessarily mean the same thing

    • tripflag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It depends who you ask (which we can already tell hehe), but I’d say YES, because you’re the one running the show – you’re free to grab all of your bits and pieces at any time, and move to a different provider. That flexibility of not being locked into one specific cloud service (which can suddenly take a bad turn) is what’s precious to me.

      And on a related note, I also make sure that this applies to my software-stack too – I’m not running anything that would be annoying to swap out if it turns bad.

    • hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Your stuff is still in the cloud, so I would say no. It’s better than using the big tech products, but I wouldn’t say it’s fully “self hosted”. Not that that really makes much of a difference. You’re still pretty much in control of everything, so you should be fine.

      • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Where is the tipping point though? If I have a server at my parents house, they live in Germany and I in Korea, does my dad host it then because he is paying for the electricity and the access to the internet and makes sure those things work?

        • hperrin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Your parents’ house isn’t the cloud, so yeah, it’s self hosted. The “tipping point” is whether you’re using a hosting provider.

          • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Isn’t my dad the hosting provider? I ordered the hardware, he connected it to his switch and his electricity and pressed the button to start it the first time. From there on I logged in to his VPN and set up the server like I would at Hetzner.

            But you’re right it doesn’t really make a difference. I feel the only difference it makes for me where I post my questions on Lemmy if it is in a !selfhosting community or a !linux community.

            From a feeling perspective, even if I use Hetzners cloud, I feel I self host my single user PieFed instance (and matrix, my other websites, mastodon, etc.) because I have to preform basically the same steps as for things I’m really hosting at home like open-webui, immich, peertube.

            • hperrin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              A hosting provider is a business. If your dad is a business and you are buying hosting services from him, then yes, he is a hosting provider and you are not self hosting. But that’s not what you’re doing. You’re hosting on your own hardware on your family’s internet. That’s self hosting.

              When you host on Hetzner, you’re hosting on their hardware using their internet. That’s not self hosting. It’s similar, cause like you said, you have to do a lot of the same administration work, but it’s not self hosting.

              Where it gets a little murky is rack space providers. Then you’re hosting on your own hardware, but it’s not your own internet, and there’s staff there to help you… kinda iffy whether you’re self hosting, but I’d say yeah, since you own the hardware.

          • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            They are using a hosting provider - their dad.

            “The cloud” is also just a bunch of machines in a basement. Lots of machines in lots of “basements”, but still.

            • hperrin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Their dad is not a hosting provider. I mean, maybe he is, but that would be really weird.

            • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              “hosting provider” in this instance I think means “do you pay them (whoever has the hardware in their possession) a monthly/quarterly/yearly fee”

              otherwise you can also say “well ACTUALLY your isp is providing the ability to host on the wan so they are the real hosting provider” and such…

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Why wouldn’t you just use Docker or Podman

      Manually installing stuff is actually harder in a lot of cases

      • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah why wouldn’t you want to know how things work!

        I obviously don’t know you, but to me it seems that a majority of Docker users know how to spin up a container, but have zero knowledge of how to fix issues within their containers, or to create their own for their custom needs.

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s half the point of the container… You let an expert set it up so you don’t have to know it on that level. You can manage fast more containers this way.

          • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            OK, but I’d rather be the expert.

            And I have no troubling spinning up new services, fast. Currently sitting at around ~30 Internet-facing services, 0 docker containers, and reproducing those installs from scratch + restoring backups would be a single command plus waiting 5 minutes.

            • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              reproducing those installs from scratch + restoring backups would be a single command plus waiting 5 minutes.

              Is that with Ansible or your own tooling or something else?

                • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I’ve been wanting to tinker with NixOS. I’ve stuck in the stone ages automating VM deployments on my Proxmox cluster using ansible. One line and about 30 minutes (cuda install is a beast) to build a reproducible VM running llama.cpp with llama-swap.

            • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              30, that’s cute. I currently have 70 containers running on my home server. That doesn’t include any lab I run or the stuff I use at work. Containers make life much easier. I also guarantee you don’t know those apps as well as you think you do either. Just being able to install and configure something doesn’t mean you know the inner workings of them. I used to do the same thing you do. Eventually, I would rather spend my time doing other things or learning certain things more in-depth and be okay with a working knowledge of others. It can be fun and rewarding to do things the hard way but don’t kid yourself and think you’re somehow superior for doing it that way.

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Truly awesome that this hobby is getting coverage! I’m very very lazy when it comes to self-hosting, by far my largest project was moving off Spotify and archiving all my playlists.

    Rotating 3 API keys for spotdl and a YTP free trial for that sweet sweet 256kbps AAC then Musicbrainz Picard to label correctly all the music (automatic was nearly almost always wrong), then automating rebuilding the m3u8 playlists followed by the insane work of correcting all the little imperfections. Must’ve taken me like 2-3 weeks of just working on it most of the day.

    But the result? A proper offline music library with all my main playlists with each song at the proper position and order in my playlists with the correct (Spotify) metadata using correct versions of the songs in at least 256kbps AAC (and many cases FLAC and where available non-vinyl hi-res).

    Tossed on an old dell workstation I got for £50. Hosting navidrome where my JF, Qbittorrent-nox and Immich live. Using symfonium on my phone. Can access remotely via OpenVPN. Couldn’t be happier.

    • bulwark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Dude Navidrome is so great. I hooked my my decades worth of music collection up to it and now I can stream b-side tracks and indie bands that weren’t on Spotify. Plus when I hit random I know it’s actually random and not some algo to sell the newest slop that Spotify is pushing.

      • nfreak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I grew out of just about everything in my old digital library so it’s been long gone, but I didn’t realize just how much stuff I had on my old bandcamp account already. Grabbed all of that, bought a bunch more, obtained everything else from my Tidal rotations and slapped it all into Navidrome.

        The initial setup is definitely a pain but the payoff has been tremendous. Not financially though - I spent more buying new shit from small artists than I would spend on a streaming service in a year. But that goes so much further for them than streaming does anyway.