E: /stoned

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Well yes, but only by a little. It was using ancient measuring techniques which were highly error-prone. Like running from one place to the next and counting the length manually. Shit like that. Still impressively close to the real size!

    • RandomVideos@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      But if the people deciding what the meter was at first were allowed to make errors, why werent the people deciding what the new meter was?

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Like what the other person said, you don’t know the extent of your error until you have a more accurate measuring technique.

        And you don’t just redefine an already-established unit. 😅 Rather, all the things that depend on the meter will be fucked up instead.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah but no. An established unit didn’t change. Otherwise all the old literature will depend on history rather than just still be true and valid.