Recently I was locked out of my own Ghost blog platform because they decided they were going to add Email 2FA. I also cannot add any other authors because that requires email verification.

Today I was looking at installing Bonfire and came across this:

Bonfire requires working email for user signups, password resets, and notifications. Most installations will need email configuration before the instance is usable.

Setting up email is a pain in the ass, costs money, is dependent on 3rd parties, violates privacy, and is just completely unnecessary. Why wouldn’t you give users the option to not use it? It’s infuriating!

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Most people have no idea they exist.

      That is my point.

      If you write software, and need a way for it communicate with the user outside of the app, implementing email is simple, just about everyone with internet access has an email address and it is free.

      XMPP/Matrix is a lot of added work that will only benefit those who:

      1. Knows what they are and
      2. Has or are willing to set up an account and
      3. Care enough about it to do that rather than just using email.

      I think you will find that the groups of persons who all three critera fits is vanishingly small.

      So, please tell me why a developer should focus their time doing that rather than building the core features of the app.

      EDIT:

      I write this as someone who has used Jabber/XMPP and Matrix in the past, they are great services and I wish they had a longer reach. This is not a hill for you to die on.

      • artyom@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        So, please tell me why a developer should focus their time doing that rather than building the core features of the app.

        It’s a whole lot less work than configuring email.

        How much work do you think it is to add a toggle that makes email optional?

        • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s a whole lot less work than configuring email.

          It’s a crapload more work to support XMPP/Matrix/whatever messaging on any platform than just using a robust, reliable, resilient, widely supported good old SMTP. For you it might be easier to input your account (which at least on XMPP resemble quite a bit of email address) but for the developer it’s totally different thing. Also practically everyone accessing a website has an email address and if they’d decide to support some mesaging platform it’d make more sense to use whatsapp than XMPP since it’s vastly more popular.

          • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            It’s a crapload more work to support XMPP/Matrix/whatever messaging on any platform than just using a robust, reliable, resilient, widely supported good old SMTP

            For the minimal of sending out a message to their accounts, they are just as easy as each other. Heck, there are simple packages to send XMPP messages from the CLI.

          • artyom@piefed.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s a crapload more work to support XMPP/Matrix/whatever messaging on any platform than…SMTP

            It’s absolutely not.

            it’d make more sense to use whatsapp

            It’d make far less sense considering both the fact that it’s a Meta-owned proprietary data collection and advertising product, and also that they simply don’t support such a functionality.

            • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              It’s a crapload more work to support XMPP/Matrix/whatever messaging on any platform than…SMTP

              It’s absolutely not.

              And you know this since you’ve written code to manage both on different environments, right?

              Also, whatsapp supports all kinds of “bots” and it has absolutely massive userspace compared to pretty much any other instant message application. It doesn’t matter if you create the perfect protocol and platform for this kind of thing if there’s 7 people globally using it.

              • artyom@piefed.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                And you know this since you’ve written code to manage both on different environments, right?

                You don’t have to write code to configure Matrix/XMPP.

                it has absolutely massive userspace

                You keep saying this as if user adoption is the only thing that matters. 99% of self-hosted stuff has tiny “userspace” so I don’t know what you’re on about.

                • stoy@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  You don’t have to write code to configure Matrix/XMPP.

                  You do realize that the developers need to write code to configure a Matrix/XMPP module? The module doesn’t just appear out your immagination.

                  Then it will need to be maintained as security holes are discovered.

                  Tell me again why developers should spend the time and resources to maintain a feature that at best will have a marginal impact on the userbase, over focusing on the core of the project.

                • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  How you imagine things send messages to reset your passwords, sending notifications and whatever is currently managed via email than some piece of code creating and sending messages, managing possible errors with them and potentially also monitoring/logging the message traffic for statistics or debugging?

                  User adoption matters if you want your thing to be actually useful for the actual users. And supporting any messaging system requires effort, so it makes sense to spend limited resources on a thing which has the biggest userspace. If you want to run matrix server which has you and your dog using it, go ahead, but don’t be surprised if you want to contact your neighbor and he’ll look like you have two heads when you start to explain how to reach you.

                  • artyom@piefed.socialOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    so it makes sense to spend limited resources on a thing which has the biggest userspace

                    It makes zero sense to spend any resources on adding compatibility with proprietary and malicious protocols, regardless of “userspace”.