You could claim that it knows the pattern of how references are formatted, depending on what you mean by the word know. Therefore, 100% uninteresting discussion of semantics.
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
Cake day: February 15th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Semantics 😴
capybara@lemm.eeto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•What are the ethics behind purchasing a book from an author you don't agree with?English1·5 days agoConvenientn’t
capybara@lemm.eeto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•What are the ethics behind purchasing a book from an author you don't agree with?English4·5 days agoPeople who spread disinformation and conspiracy theories should profit as little as possible from it
capybara@lemm.eeto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•What are the ethics behind purchasing a book from an author you don't agree with?English43·5 days agoIf you borrow it from the library the author typically gets a little compensation
No one cares about the definition of knowledge to this extent except for philosophers. The person who originally used the word “know” most definitely didn’t give a single shit about the philosophical perspective. Therefore, you shitting yourself a word not being used exactly as you’d like instead of understanding the usage in the context is very much semantics.