I’ve been giving this some thought and the only line I can see is banning the calls for violence against a individual or protected group.

I think anything more or less restrictive causes trouble.

Example points:

• Cannot discuss declaring war (voilence) on another country.
• Can never lie or can not cause harm = can not tell a joke.
• Cannot ban misinformation = who decides? In the 1960 being gay was illegal, should the gay right movement have been banned as misinformation?

Societies grow by challenging norms.

I think our weird society can be fixed by teaching critical thinking in schools and introspection. However, philosophers have been saying similar things for at least 2000 years and it hasn’t caught on yet.

Happy to discuss the above as I’d like to work the angles for a better line, if we think there is one.

Can you give us an example of point 1 with regards to hate speech? Or a call for violence against another?

Can you define “hurt”. Do you mean physically or emotionally? If the latter then I think it is too restrictive.