Yoddel_Hickory

Start avoiding Logitech then. I have had three of their Anywhere MX mice of various generations, and now an MX Master mouse. They are expensive, and have ALL had switches start failing, that I had to replace and solder. Two of my coworkers have the same mouse, and like clockwork, after one and a half years one started failing. The other one is not at this mark yet, but I bet the same will happen.

I bought a Keychron mouse to replace it. It was also cheaper.

And to clarify, my comment was not to say it was expected that mice would last that short, rather that it is possible to use it enough that it falls within the expected lifespan in clicks of the switches they give.

I mean I work 5 days a week so there is that already. That plus playing games on the evenings and weekends and I bet you can near that easily.

That’s only once every 3 seconds if you use it 8 hours per day for work.

Of course, but you said:

But the code indent is wrong, and it even changed the function definition of the unrelated next function.

It is weird to split the two in your sentence, as only the indentation of the next function definition was changed, not the definition itself.

You can just take the L and say you didn’t see that the function definition that was “added” was just “removed” at the top. It is an easy mistake to make, I know I’ve done it many times.

Actually the function definition is unchanged. The line that was “added” at the bottom was also “removed” at the top. This is just the Git diff generator being confused, which won’t come as a surprise to anyone that has ever used it.

The indendentation really is messed-up though.