-
Yes, it is.
-
Yes, it is.
-
It is an oil on canvas painting.
Any other bold claims you’d like to make? The arrogance is astounding. To make two different comments seperated by 20 minutes insisting something you’re wrong about…
Yes, it is.
Yes, it is.
It is an oil on canvas painting.
Any other bold claims you’d like to make? The arrogance is astounding. To make two different comments seperated by 20 minutes insisting something you’re wrong about…
Correct. The issue in this specific comment thread is not that AI is hard to discern. That is a discussion for a different thread. The discussion here is that people are being lazy and using AI as an excuse to dismiss stuff instead of using rational thought and attempting to solve the answer for themselves.
As said.
I don’t have enough crayons to keep explaining this.
Your family after I’m through with you.
/s <3
Hell no. I post ‘Not OC’ because one user decided to have a screaming meltdown about how I was misleading people by uploading stuff and not saying ‘Not OC’. I’m already babysitting enough people on Lemmy. The ‘Oh this is AI’ people can deal with having their stupidity repeatedly called out to their face and deal with my frustration that they don’t have enough brain cells to scoop together the ability to type tineye.com into the address bar.
Your frustration is proof enough of that
My frustration is proof that people are incapable of rational thought without their hand being held.
I’m disappointed I have to do the same thing, again, in the same comment thread.
Which is a problem to deal with when it arises. What exhausts me is having to say “No it isn’t AI, it’s real, you just forgot about basic photography. Also stop wasting my time with these accusations that will have people like a mob downvoting something and losing their mind when using tineye for 5 seconds would answer your question.”
I had shit removed from @Pics@lemmy.world because the mod over there saw two accusations of an image being AI and removed it and refused blatant proof of it being a photo from it being from multiple angles with the same “errors”. It’s why I stopped posting there entirely and went to nocontextpics. When the mods are jumping on the bandwagon then it isn’t a place I want to be associated with.
I’m going to start ripping my own hair out of my fucking scalp. It’s like every post I make now has an accusation of AI because of real world photography not always making 100% sense.
This is AI though right?
No
Not real kitties.
Real kitties.
The white and black blur in between the cats is clearly trying to be a tail but the color and placement are wrong.
Could also be a dog or another cat that’s behind the two. That blur is on another stair and these two are much closer to the camera, can easily obscure something behind them.
The pile in the top right doesn’t make sense
It’s blurry as hell. You have no idea what that is. You called it a ‘pile’. That could also be flaking off concrete or vines. Saying that it “doesn’t make sense” when you have so little information on what it is is not the immediate assumption you should be making. If you’re dismissing things because of an assumption made on a lack of information then it’s not helpful to anyone.
the stairs leading to a square door set at an angle from the stairs is wrong
Once again, perspective. This is at the bottom of a set of stairs looking up. You would not be able to see the landing at the top that would continue into that door. Moreover, pretty sure that door is a gate for the gap to the right of it. The white is the same as the railing.
and the building to the left of that makes no sense either.
You literally can’t see it.
Plus the overly rich texture of the stairs
Jesus christ. Concrete just looks like that sometimes.
What I would really like is for people to bother going to look for an original source before making these accusations. You think an AI two years ago was able to make that image with no blatant errors in the cats themselves? Especially when no one else in the post is making that accusation? And especially when the same poster made another post of AI cats and it looked like this?
These accusations are exhausting. Firstly because they’re just accusations with zero follow up. It took me 10 seconds to find the original post of that image. Why couldn’t you have done that yourself? Secondly because it scares the hell out of me that things we’ve known about since the dawn of photography are being forgotten about en masse for the easy way of pointing and saying “AI.”
Exactly. You just have to try harder to be a better person, that’s all
Oh you were new to even reddit. The thing you want is something that was only added there a few years ago. Before it worked the exact same way as it does here.
Sorry, we just expect you to be an adult and not care about the numbers. That’s why there isn’t a count on your page. Do you know how often I have people follow me around in my comments to downvote me? A lot. Know what I do? Nothing because I’m over 30.
Yes. Having memes made about me.
Because they’re wrong and because it is an oil on canvas painting.
Source