Well, being the job and all, yes. But also set expectations, which there cannot be any based on the nothing job ad. Woudlt touch that with a 10ft pole.

And 1 million lines to truly review. Reviewers are used to their own heuristics based on common and critical mistakes to find errors. I reckon AI errors won’t follow familair patterns, making reviews even more tedious.

Well, not too hard, that would be too quick

Depends who it’s for, but i would say no.

No, not if you are serious and have external customers or users that you are expected to serve/maintain.

AI as it is is just a power-hungry pattern recognition system. It will probably flag some things, whether true or not, depending on the language/framework. It’s certainly not capable of performing an unassisted code review in a security/quality conscious environment.

I’ve spent too long fixing human errors, its going to be a mess with AI increasingly doing actual ‘development’.

That sounds harsh, but it isn’t meant to be. Just have a human expert review and investigate as early as possible so you know you are on track and not building around a glaring issue. Also, do a thorough review, testing, and penetration testing if there is a production environment with actual users.

Has to be done via github though

From the article, https://javascript.tm/ is a petition you can sign for Oracle to drop the trade mark claim

Being really shitty in every way for a long term should produce a sentient fridge mould that we can license.