MotoAsh

The irony of your stupidity and judgement in that post is hilarious.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

rofl no

Removed by mod

It’d definitely be a good thing. Point is, getting rid of cars won’t be a good thing until effective alternatives are actually available.

It will always be possible. The punishments need to be very harsh, because white collar crime never “needs” to happen.

Why was it exposed to the internet with all ports open? Even Linux is getting hacked if you’re fucking rawdogging every packet that shows up…

(yes I know it’s likely from a bunch of BS services only Windows would be dumb enough to enable by default, but the point still stands that any computer that’s exposed to the internet directly needs to be carefully locked down)

lol a minority with the majority of power…

Do you … do you not understand how systemic racism works…?

Petty crime, sure.

White collar crime is pure greed, though, and that’s 90% of what politicians are doing right now in the US…

There are many motivations for crime, and we need to start punishing the poeple that don’t “have” to do the crime A LOT more harshly, and the people that do “have” to commit the crime far less.

You’re going to need A LOT more public transit already in place before banning cars would ever be a remotely ‘good’ idea.

Yea, I agree in the general sense, although you will always have something akin to countries so long as the entire world isn’t literally communist. Thus making the distinction rather pointless.

No shit. Nowhere did I say you’d convince a bigot with these arguments, especially bigots as committed to the bit as Israelis…

BTW, if you think Palestinians are a majority in relation to Israel and the other nations involved in that conflict, ESPECIALLY in power, then you are only exemplifying your lack of understanding of how the real world works.

Your glee with engaging with your own ignorance is just pathetic.

rofl way to say you don’t understand how the world works without just saying it.

It has never existed and cannot exist next to capitalism. You are making MANY mistakes with your asinine post.

China isn’t not communist because they engage with capitalism… They’re not communist because their entire system isn’t communist…

When there’s one party, one ruler, and one set of people that get to rule over the rest … that’s specifically NOT communism.

Even if they didn’t engage with the world market, made every business a coop, they would still not be communist. At all.

That’s why any place with a fucking brain at minimum massively controls the assholes and at maximum puts them to death.

A place that enjoys freedom can exist, but what cannot happen is allowing the greedy assholes to strip away protections.

Though when money IS everyones’ “god”, the rich and greedy are more divine than us plebs…

In before the tankies try to claim China is totally seriously communist, no really.

It seems you’re making the oppposite mistake retard conservatives make, by pretending that actual communism would be so bad if it even could exist in a world dominated by capitalist global trade.

If they turn it in to a white genocide problem, then you already have your answer: They don’t care about minorities.