dullbananas (Joseph Silva)@lemmy.ca to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 15 days agocodinglemmy.caimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down10
arrow-up15arrow-down1imagecodinglemmy.cadullbananas (Joseph Silva)@lemmy.ca to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 15 days agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·14 days agoBut if you’ve died, then were undead, and then died again, you’d be un-undead right? So alive? It’s basic double jeopardy.
minus-squareulterno@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-214 days agoYou put the double ‘un’ but forgot the double ‘dead’. Oh, I didn’t realise you were actually catching the thing mid statement. Still: A dead un-dead would be a re-dead, not very alive Considering the 2x dead person is still capable of commenting, I would assume it came back after re-death and is now in some other condition.
But if you’ve died, then were undead, and then died again, you’d be un-undead right? So alive? It’s basic double jeopardy.
You put the double ‘un’ but forgot the double ‘dead’.Oh, I didn’t realise you were actually catching the thing mid statement.
Still: