• pntha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    …the obvious flaw that said investigations would clearly conclude the posts were doctored?

    The metadata of posts include too many data points (IP address, GPS coords, etc.) needing precise alteration in line with the exact movements of a victim that it would just be too complex to achieve a desirable outcome for Musk. Even if the SS’s investigations were subjective in their approach and/or conclusion, independent investigations would provide a trove of reasonable doubt, even if denied access to the data (which, in itself, would be a point of reasonable doubt).

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re quite enthusiastic there with the idea that anyone would actually investigate any of that instead of just saying “yeap, treason!”

      • pntha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Let’s run a little scenario: a reporter’s post is doctored or posted completely outside of their control. Their boss calls them in:
        “Did you post this?”
        “No”
        “Yeap, treason!”

        Please don’t confuse enthusiasm with critical thinking.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You haven’t watched the news lately, have you? Trump simply says you’re a traitor and you’ll be “investigated” as in someone will write a doc saying why you should be deported (you’re a terrorist! Evidence not required) and you’ll be on a flight out.

          This current US government really doesn’t give a shit about facts

        • ysjet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ah yes, because this administration is SO good about providing people with due process.

          • pntha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            What I’m trying to convey, in the face of your obnoxious sarcasm, is that while the administration would of course interfere in what should be an objective investigation, politicians and reporters have a wealth of powerful advocates in their support networks. The administration can only control the message/investigation of the SS. They cannot control the message or investigations of the victim’s support network, however hard they may try.

            • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Dear baby Jesus, dude, go watch some “news” from US sources? Everyone just went with the program and there is very little pushback from the press. Oh yeah, there is pushback but it’s a fraction of what it could be, should be.