cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 12 days agoSoftware Terminologyimagemessage-square206linkfedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down150cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.17Karrow-down1imageSoftware Terminologycm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 12 days agomessage-square206linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareperishthethought@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·12 days agoThis is really, “what techs call it” and “what non-techs call it”. As a tech, I usually know what someone means when they “app”. It’s “glitch” that drives me mad though. Glitch sounds like a ghost caused the error one tine only, versus some lazy coder.
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·12 days agoTo be fair i would consider a glitch to be closer to a ghost causing it than a lazy developer. I consider a “bug” to be something caused by the code (bad error handling, bad logic, etc) and a “glitch” to be something more random or environmental
minus-squareperishthethought@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 days agoYes! Agreed. But for some reason, the only word everyone uses these days is “glitch”. And I don’t know why, but that really fries my grits.
This is really, “what techs call it” and “what non-techs call it”.
As a tech, I usually know what someone means when they “app”.
It’s “glitch” that drives me mad though. Glitch sounds like a ghost caused the error one tine only, versus some lazy coder.
To be fair i would consider a glitch to be closer to a ghost causing it than a lazy developer.
I consider a “bug” to be something caused by the code (bad error handling, bad logic, etc) and a “glitch” to be something more random or environmental
Yes! Agreed. But for some reason, the only word everyone uses these days is “glitch”. And I don’t know why, but that really fries my grits.