

The point is not a few less milliseconds, it’s many hours of reduced development for people implementing DynamoDB
So you’re comparing claimed performance (execution) gains to development time? Yeah, that makes sense.
I think you’re a bot.
The point is not a few less milliseconds, it’s many hours of reduced development for people implementing DynamoDB
So you’re comparing claimed performance (execution) gains to development time? Yeah, that makes sense.
I think you’re a bot.
Cutlet is the best bad name for a cat. The cat will know it’s both your friend and a survival ration.
Thank you.
How did you check the performance though for the ORM? You claim it’s faster that AWS SDK, which literally impossible, as you are using AWS SDK to power it.
Out of curiosity, what do they do and did you use agentic approach or prompt and then copy?
Great example.
Wouldn’t getchar()
be more appropriate here? Last time I used C it was 16 years ago.
let ret = someCondition ? expensiveOperation() : otherOperation()
?
Well, I don’t know your use case well enough, but I guess you might have perfect reason for that behavior.
One thing that comes to my mind is the old Try in C#
bool parsedSuccessfully = int.TryParse("123", out int result);
But I guess more popular approach would be to use Error as Values, right?
E.g. something like this
Outcome<Exception, Int> result = int.TotallyNewParse("123");
To be honest I always disliked variable declaration without value assignment, so to me both options suck. :)
Wait until you learn about transducers (Are they in Go? If not natively, someone definitely ported them) and the abominations fp people code with them.
So… The medical professional is taking voice notes and then they get transcribed (ok, this is fine) - and then summarized automatically? I don’t think the summary is a good idea - it’s not a car factory, the MD should get to know my medical history, not just a summary of one.
Your though process is wrong. You need to backpedal it. One bad apple doesn’t mean we should burn the orchard. And you can perverse anything good into an abomination.
eat the rich
How you want to do that without unions? Dude, saying out loud
[I wonder] if any union is worth it if that’s the risk of what they could become.
Is not helping anyone.
Take an L and do better.
With that mindset, why bother living or leaving the bed? Imagine the worst day you could have, why risk it?
And I generally don’t need 5-in-1 shower products
Well, technically a bar of soap is all-in-one product. You can even wash clothes with it.
But I get your point, I see overpriced male-targetted 3-in-1 soap gels everywhere.
It must be sad having so little manliness that smell could take from it.
Honestly, you’re not his parent, he’s an adult and needs to start taking care of himself - or GTFO.
My point is “summarizing over all of those” and “poisoning”.
Source of category 1 says cheese is made from XYZ and yellow
Source from category 2 confirms 1 in different words and adds that it has holes
Source from category 3 confirms 2 and adds that its also blue, not only yellow
Source 4 talks about blue cheese only
Poisoning would mean that in the summary cheese is yellow with blue holes.
So scrapping “popular websites” plus “someone said this is a good source for topic X” plus wikipedia? And summarizing over them all? That sounds like a very bad idea, because it’s very fragile to poisoning?
Size and noise I guess.
There’s a vast difference between capability for empathy (as in: feeling someone else’s feelings) and acting upon that feeling.
Please don’t upvote this person, I think they’re a bot. The libs use AWS SDK internally and claim 90% performance boost over AWS SDK, and the person explains it as “you can write less verbose code so development time is shorter”