• Robaque@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Hey, idk all the names people have made up to categorise fallacies, but I do know you misapplied the no true scotsman fallacy over a semantic disagreement, or at least a misunderstanding.

      • Robaque@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I guess it’s easy to convince yourself of that when you haven’t really engaged with what I said, lol

        • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Says the guy who cried fallacy but couldn’t name what it is.

          You’re not a serious person, I engaged with what you said and you couldn’t respond with shit. You are obviously just pissed that I preempted what you were going to say.

          • Robaque@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            Lol what? Are you a troll? Or a bot?

            Fallacy is just faulty reasoning, I don’t need to know all the ins and outs of how philosophers/logicians categorise them to know how to point out faulty reasoning. Knowing how to reason about things is far more important than throwing around buzzwords.

            You accuse me of not being studious, yet you refuse to actually engage with what I say - you know what kind of fallacy that is? An ad hominem. Even a supposed ignoramus like me knows that. I wonder what that makes you?